The Implicit Associates Test (IAT) was first developed and tested by Greenwald and others in 1998. The IAT is the most well-known method of measuring people’s unconscious beliefs and preferences (Greenwald et al., 1998).
The IAT measures the
extent to which an individual associates two concepts together. For example it
measures implicit racism (racism that operates unconsciously and unintentionally)
toward African American, it does this for example by comparing how quickly or
slowly participants associates African American cues (such as black face) with
negative and positive concepts compared to how quickly or slowly the participants
make the same kinds of associations with European American cues (Greenwald et
al., 1998).
The IAT has sparked an
explosion of new research in the past decade about racism and other forms of
discrimination and prejudice (Smith & Nosek, 2010).
Religion
and Gender-Career IATs
I took the Religion IAT
and later took the Gender-Career IAT.
Religion
(Religious) IAT
This IAT showed that
out of the four religions; Christianity, Judaism, Islam, and Hinduism, I have a
more positive attitude/view toward Judaism, a more negative attitude/view toward
Christianity and Hinduism, and then a more negative view toward Islam.
Though I was not aware
of my more positive attitude toward Judaism, I’m not surprise. I grew up in in
a town that when I was young thought was a normal town, but looking at it now I
see it as being a somewhat prominently Jewish neighborhood. I grew up being
exposed to Judaism, learning about it, associating it with more individual people,
rather than a group of people. I also think it helped that I learned about
Judaism and Jewish people, but it was never forced upon me.
I’m not surprised by
the more negative attitude toward Christianity, though I did grow up around Christianity
as well, much like I did with Judaism. The difference is though is that I went
to an all-girls private Catholic high school, despite not being Catholic or Christian.
I had to learn about Christianity (Catholicism) in a more forceful way I think,
so I’m not surprised that I have a slight more unconscious negative view towards
Christianity, because I do have at times a slightly more conscious negative
view toward Christianity. I try to consciously work through it, as after going
to college I try to think less negatively about the Catholic religion and Christianity
in general.
I was surprised by that my view/attitude toward Hinduism was the same as my view toward Christianity. Just because I really don’t have any conscious thoughts about Hinduism, because I’m not really exposed to it that often. I have learned about Hinduism in religion classes and through the media, but it’s not really a prominent religion in NJ or in TX, at least not from what I have seen.
I am a bit surprised
and at the same time not that surprised that Islam was the religion I had the
most negative view of. I think this shows the most unconscious attitude I have
toward a religion, because I do try to consciously not think negatively about
the Islam religion, because there is so much negativity toward it in the USA
media. Consciously I know the numbers and statistics to the number of ‘terrorists’
out there and the number of Islamic people in the world, but despite that I
grew up in a country where there is a lot of negative associations reinforced
often, through the news, internet, TV-shows, and in general people’s opinions.
Overall though it looked
that all the religions were not really high on the scale of positive and negative
scale from the IAT test. They all looked that they were in the middle. I know that
I do have certain unconscious negative attitudes towards certain religions,
because of the fact that I grew up in the USA in the time that I did.
Gender-Career
IAT
According to the data,
I have a moderate automatic association of male with career and female with
family compared to female with career and male with family.
I’m not that surprised
by this, as I think I do automatically see woman being with family and men
being with a career. I suppose I’m a little bit surprised thought that it’s not
less, because I did grow up in an household where both my parents had an active
career, and I was prominently raised by hired help (female help though), so actually
looking at that fact I suppose I’m not that surprise.
Even though my mom
actively instilled into me having a career was important and that since I live
in a time where females can have a career, I definitely should have one. At the
same time I was taken care of by female nannies and never once did my parents
even consider a male nanny.
Personal
Example: In fact one time I did meet a guy who was a
professional male nanny and I thought that was weird. I even have to admit I
thought it was more weird when I discovered that he was straight, and though I’m
not proud of these thoughts, I was thinking ‘weirdo’, ‘pedophile’, ‘creep’, and
‘he probably is gay’. The idea of a straight male doing something so female associated
(taking care of children), despite it being a job was so weird to me, to my
family and my friends. Despite the fact that later we all said it was perfectly
acceptable for a straight male to be a nanny, though our first reactions showed
the exact opposite attitude.
I think my results from
this IAT, not only show some of my conscious thoughts that I have, but also unconscious.
These results are a product of how I grew up and especially what I have been
shown outside of my family with TV-shows, book, and the news.
(Word Count-969)
~*~*~*~*~
References
Greenwald, A. G.,
McGhee, D. E., & Shwartz, J.L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences
in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
Kassin, S., Fein, S.,
& Markus, H. F. (2011). The social self: Mechanisms of self-enhancement. Social
Psychology, 8, 81-83.
Smith, C.T., &
Nosek, B. A. (2010). Implicit Association Test. IN I B Weiner & W.E.
Craighead (Eds.), Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
I also took the Gender-Career IAT. Similar to you I also associate males with career and females with family. I was surprised by this, just like you, because I also grew up with both parents working and also always had hired help. However, unlike you, I never thought about the impact of having a nanny (mine also were all female). Now that I re-think about my results, it makes sense that I would have a propensity to associate males with career and females with family. I'm always surprised about the extent to which our surroundings have an effect on us.
ReplyDelete