An Attitude is an individual’s positive, negative, or mixed reaction to another person, an object, or an idea. Everyone has attitudes; lifestyle choices or beliefs, political affiliation, health choices, TV shows/movies, and what brands we use in our everyday life. An individual’s self-esteem is an attitude that they have about themselves, an attraction is a positive attitude toward another person, and prejudice is a negative toward another person, and so forth (Albarracin, Johnson, & Zanna, 2005; Crano & Prislin, 2008; Fazio & Petty, 2008).
People’s attitudes can’t be expressed simply as either
loving something or hating something. Attitudes can vary in the intensity or
strength of the individual; people can react positively or negatively, people
can also react with ambivalence (having strong, but mixed emotions), and or
with indifference (Cacioppo et al., 1997). Individuals differ in the extent to
which they tend to stimuli whether they generally have strong reactions or low
reactions (Bizer et al., 2004; Jarvis & Petty, 1996).
Everyone, no matter who they are routinely forms attitudes
toward people, places, objects, and ideas that they encounter in their daily
lives. This can’t be help as it tends to be an automatic process; like a reflex
(Bargh et al., 1996; Cunningham et al., 2003; Duckworth et al., 2002; Ferguson,
2007).
Attitudes are part of daily life and are unavoidable, but
they can also be useful as they enable people to judge quickly and with little
thought (Maio & Olson, 2000).
Preexisting attitudes exist for everyone and they can cause
some issues. They can cause people to become close-minded, bias in the way they
interpret and process new information, and make people more resistant to change
(Fazio et al., 2000).
Personal Example: Diet Coke
Everyone has a strong preference for a brand, whether it be
clothing, computer, cellphone, food, or ect. There is that one brand named
item, that despite what the statistics may show us, people tell us, and or what
the commercials try to sell, we firmly believe that our brand name is the best
and we will choose it without a doubt.
While most people don’t feel strongly about every brand item
they use, there will be always that one despite other brands or generic
versions being just as good.
People may prefer Religion Jeans, Old Navy, Mac, Nike, Burger
King, Snapple, Honda, or Coca Cola to whatever else.
For me personally I am a Diet Coke person. I grew up on it
and most of my family drinks it. I have a very strong positive reaction toward
Diet Coke in comparison to what I feel as is a moderately negate reaction
toward Diet Pepsi. Despite the fact that people tell me they taste the same and
there is no difference, I will always choose Diet Coke. It taste better in my
opinion, but at the same time I could fabricate the taste in my head to reason
my irrational preference.
I will admit that in a restaurant I will have a Diet Pepsi
if I have to. But recently I’ve realized how dedicate I am to getting Diet
Coke.
My parents live in Arizona, so I travel a lot by plane, and
because of that I spend a lot of time at airports. In my last recent trips I
have notice that most of the restaurants, convenient stores, and even vending
machines are Pepsi affiliated. In fact the Airports that I frequent (Texas and Arizona)
there seems to be only one type of restaurant that has my Diet Coke. That
restaurant is McDonald’s and to be frank McDonald’s is far from my favorite
place to eat, but I have (multiple times) walk and extra 15 to 20 minutes in a
busy airport to go to McDonalds so I can get a Diet Coke. Despite the fact that
there are tons of other places in the airport that are always much closer and
have a similar drink.
My preference for Diet Coke or my preexisting attitude
towards Diet Coke makes me bias toward Coco Cola, close minded about Pepsi, and
to put it frankly unreasonably stubborn at times.
Word Count-682
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
References
Albarracin, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds). (2005). The hand-book of attitudes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bargh, J. A, Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230-244.
Bizer, G., Krosnick, J., Holbrock, A., Wheller. S., Rucker, D., & Petty, R. E. (2004). The impact of personality on cognitive, behavioral, and affective political processes: The effects of need to evaluate. Journal of Personality, 72, 995-1027.
Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Bernston, G. G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, I, 3-35.
Crano, W. D., & Prislin, R. (Eds). (2008). Attitudes and attitude change. New York: Psychological Press.
Cunningham, W. A., Johnson, M. K., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C, & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Separable neural components in the processing of black and white faces. Psychological Science, 15, 806-813.
Albarracin, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds). (2005). The hand-book of attitudes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bargh, J. A, Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230-244.
Bizer, G., Krosnick, J., Holbrock, A., Wheller. S., Rucker, D., & Petty, R. E. (2004). The impact of personality on cognitive, behavioral, and affective political processes: The effects of need to evaluate. Journal of Personality, 72, 995-1027.
Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Bernston, G. G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, I, 3-35.
Crano, W. D., & Prislin, R. (Eds). (2008). Attitudes and attitude change. New York: Psychological Press.
Cunningham, W. A., Johnson, M. K., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C, & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Separable neural components in the processing of black and white faces. Psychological Science, 15, 806-813.
Duckworth, K. K.,
Bargh, J. A., Garcia, M., & Chaiken, S. (2002). The automatic evaluation of
novel stimuli. Psychological Science,
13, 513-519.
Fazio, R. H., Ledbetter, J. E., & Towles-Schwen, T. (2000).
On the costs of accessible attitudes: Detecting that the attitude object has
changed. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 78, 197-210.
Fazio, R. H., & Petty, R., E., (Eds). (2008). Attitudes: Their structure, function, and
consequences. New York: Psychology Press.
Ferguson, M. (2007). On the automatic evaluation of end-states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
92-596-611.
Jarvis, W. B. G.,
& Petty, R. E. (1996).The needs to evaluate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 172-194.
Kassin, S., Fein, S., & Markus, H. F. (2011). Attitudes: The study of attitudes. Social Psychology, 8, 81-83.
Maio, G., & Olson, J., M. (Eds). (2000).Why we evaluate. Function of attitudes, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kassin, S., Fein, S., & Markus, H. F. (2011). Attitudes: The study of attitudes. Social Psychology, 8, 81-83.
Maio, G., & Olson, J., M. (Eds). (2000).Why we evaluate. Function of attitudes, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
No comments:
Post a Comment